Fig. 3
From: Weighted ASTRID: fast and accurate species trees from weighted internode distances
Topological error (nRF error rate) of species tree across methods on selected conditions on the ASTRAL-II SimPhy conditions (\(n = 201, 1001, 201\), \(\text {AD} = 21, 35, 69\%\) respectively). Each subfigure depicts a different model condition. The x-axis varies in the number of genes. Results are shown averaged across 50 replicates with standard error bars. ASTRAL did not finish 24 out of the 50 replicates within four hours for \(k = 1000\) on MC11H and thus the data point was omitted. All weighted methods (wASTRID, wASTRAL) were run on gene trees reannotated with IQ-TREE aBayes support branch support and lengths. Weighted methods are more accurate than unweighted ones. wASTRID-s on MC1 was less accurate than wASTRAL-h and otherwise has the same accuracy