Table 2 Wall-clock running time (sec) across methods on selected representative simulated conditions on \(n = 101, 201, 1001\) for k ranging in 50, 200, 1000. Data points show averages across 50 replicates. ASTRAL did not finish on 24 out of the 50 replicates within four hours for \(k = 1000\) on MC11H, and thus the data point was omitted. The methods, sorted by the fastest to the slowest, are almost always wASTRID-s, ASTRID, wASTRAL-h, and ASTRAL across all shown conditions. ASTRID and wASTRID-s are much faster than ASTRAL and wASTRAL-h

From: Weighted ASTRID: fast and accurate species trees from weighted internode distances